I don't remember where I heard this line of reasoning, but it was a Matrix-like point of view: "In the future there will be those who control the machines, and those who are controlled by the machines, and I intend to be in the first group!" I do very much worry about people who are already slipping southwest of the center of your super-high-tech data viz: those in the "3" category. We've often talked about the loss of agency by peoples' value as producers being converted into value as consumers, but the AI-assisted grind that magnifies skills but diminishes impact is a concern.
Really lovely point here, that power is central to agency at every juncture in the creation and evolution of the technology. I wonder what would be different if we afforded each other agency not just in deploying LLMs, but in evolving the design of the interactions we have with them
Love this timely conversation. We're working with a group of young people on a Declaration for the Future of Work they launched yesterday, and many key points revolve around agency. The first principle states: We are not human resources, we are human investors - elevating the power of agency to the next level: https://workvue.io/declaration
Hey Zara! This is beautiful. I feel principle 6 is also very pertinent to this conversation: Real change requires shared power, not just shared feedback. Thanks for sharing!
I don't remember where I heard this line of reasoning, but it was a Matrix-like point of view: "In the future there will be those who control the machines, and those who are controlled by the machines, and I intend to be in the first group!" I do very much worry about people who are already slipping southwest of the center of your super-high-tech data viz: those in the "3" category. We've often talked about the loss of agency by peoples' value as producers being converted into value as consumers, but the AI-assisted grind that magnifies skills but diminishes impact is a concern.
Really lovely point here, that power is central to agency at every juncture in the creation and evolution of the technology. I wonder what would be different if we afforded each other agency not just in deploying LLMs, but in evolving the design of the interactions we have with them
Absolutely. What would it look like to you to "evolve the design of the interactions" we have with AI?
For one, why are we encouraged to feel like we are talking to a person when using LLMs? What happens if we design them to feel like machines?
Love this timely conversation. We're working with a group of young people on a Declaration for the Future of Work they launched yesterday, and many key points revolve around agency. The first principle states: We are not human resources, we are human investors - elevating the power of agency to the next level: https://workvue.io/declaration
Hey Zara! This is beautiful. I feel principle 6 is also very pertinent to this conversation: Real change requires shared power, not just shared feedback. Thanks for sharing!
Thanks for mentioning @CIP ! We’re doing some work around similar topics, would love to chat sometime.